[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V4 4/5] kvm : pv-ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor
On 01/18/2012 12:27 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: On 01/17/2012 04:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:56:46PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: [...] + || (vcpu->requests& ~(1UL<<KVM_REQ_PVLOCK_KICK)) + || need_resched() || signal_pending(current)) { vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE; smp_wmb(); local_irq_enable(); @@ -6711,6 +6712,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) || !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done) || vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED + || kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_PVLOCK_KICK, vcpu)The bit should only be read here (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable), but cleared on vcpu entry (along with the other kvm_check_request processing). [...] I had tried alternative approach earlier, I think that is closer to your expectation. where - flag is read in kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable - flag cleared in vcpu entry along with others. But it needs per vcpu flag to remember that pv_unhalted while clearing the flag in vcpu enter [ patch below ]. Could not find third alternative though. [...] do you think having pv_unhalt flag in below patch cause problem to live migration still? (vcpu->request bit is retained as is) OR do we have to have KVM_GET_MP_STATE changes also with below patch you mentioned earlier. Avi, Marcello, Please let me know, any comments you have on how should it look like in next version? Should I get rid of KVM_REQ_PVLOCK_KICK bit in vcpu->request and have only pv_unahlt flag as below and also add MSR as suggested? ---8<--- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index c38efd7..1bf8fa8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -5684,6 +5717,11 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) r = 1; goto out; } + if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_PVKICK, vcpu)) { + vcpu->pv_unhalted = 1; + r = 1; + goto out; + } if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu)) record_steal_time(vcpu); if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu)) @@ -6683,6 +6720,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) !vcpu->arch.apf.halted) || !list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done) || vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED + || (kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_PVKICK, vcpu) || vcpu->pv_unhalted) || atomic_read(&vcpu->arch.nmi_queued) || (kvm_arch_interrupt_allowed(vcpu) && kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)); diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h index d526231..a48e0f2 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -154,6 +155,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu { #endif struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch; + + int pv_unhalted; }; static inline int kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -770,5 +773,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_check_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } +static inline bool kvm_test_request(int req, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + if (test_bit(req, &vcpu->requests)) + return true; + else + return false; +} #endif diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index d9cfb78..55c44a2 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id) vcpu->kvm = kvm; vcpu->vcpu_id = id; vcpu->pid = NULL; + vcpu->pv_unhalted = 0; init_waitqueue_head(&vcpu->wq); kvm_async_pf_vcpu_init(vcpu); @@ -1509,11 +1510,12 @@ void mark_page_dirty(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { DEFINE_WAIT(wait); for (;;) { prepare_to_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) { + vcpu->pv_unhalted = 0; kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu); break; } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |