|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hvc_xen: implement multiconsole support
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:43:27PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > This patch implements support for multiple consoles:
> > consoles other than the first one are setup using the traditional xenbus
> > and grant-table based mechanism.
> > We use a list to keep track of the allocated consoles, we don't
> > expect too many of them anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c | 439
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> > index dd6641f..97732fb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> > #include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h>
> > @@ -30,47 +31,69 @@
> > #include <xen/xen.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/xen.h>
> > #include <xen/hvm.h>
> > +#include <xen/grant_table.h>
> > #include <xen/page.h>
> > #include <xen/events.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/io/console.h>
> > #include <xen/hvc-console.h>
> > +#include <xen/xenbus.h>
> >
> > #include "hvc_console.h"
> >
> > #define HVC_COOKIE 0x58656e /* "Xen" in hex */
> >
> > -static struct hvc_struct *hvc;
> > -static int xencons_irq;
> > +struct xencons_info {
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
> > + struct xencons_interface *intf;
> > + unsigned int evtchn;
> > + struct hvc_struct *hvc;
> > + int irq;
> > + int vtermno;
> > + grant_ref_t gntref;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static LIST_HEAD(xenconsoles);
> > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xencons_lock);
> > +static struct xenbus_driver xencons_driver;
> >
> > /* ------------------------------------------------------------------ */
> >
> > -static unsigned long console_pfn = ~0ul;
> > -static unsigned int console_evtchn = ~0ul;
> > -static struct xencons_interface *xencons_if = NULL;
> > +static struct xencons_info *vtermno_to_xencons(int vtermno)
> > +{
> > + struct xencons_info *entry, *ret = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&xenconsoles))
> > + return NULL;
> >
> > -static inline struct xencons_interface *xencons_interface(void)
> > + spin_lock(&xencons_lock);
>
> This spinlock gets hit everytime something is typed or written on the
> console right? Isn't there an spinlock already in the hvc driver...
>
> Or are we protected by the vtermnos being checked for -1?
I think you are right: the spinlock is there to protect access to the
list, so we can change list_for_each_entry to list_for_each_entry_safe
in vtermno_to_xencons and we solve the problem. All the other spinlock
acquisitions are done at console creation/destruction.
> > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &xenconsoles, list) {
> > + if (entry->vtermno == vtermno) {
> > + ret = entry;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&xencons_lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int xenbus_devid_to_vtermno(int devid)
> > {
> > - if (xencons_if != NULL)
> > - return xencons_if;
> > - if (console_pfn == ~0ul)
> > - return mfn_to_virt(xen_start_info->console.domU.mfn);
> > - else
> > - return __va(console_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + return devid + HVC_COOKIE;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void notify_daemon(void)
> > +static inline void notify_daemon(struct xencons_info *cons)
> > {
> > /* Use evtchn: this is called early, before irq is set up. */
> > - if (console_evtchn == ~0ul)
> > - notify_remote_via_evtchn(xen_start_info->console.domU.evtchn);
> > - else
> > - notify_remote_via_evtchn(console_evtchn);
> > + notify_remote_via_evtchn(cons->evtchn);
> > }
> >
> > -static int __write_console(const char *data, int len)
> > +static int __write_console(struct xencons_info *xencons,
> > + const char *data, int len)
> > {
> > - struct xencons_interface *intf = xencons_interface();
> > XENCONS_RING_IDX cons, prod;
> > + struct xencons_interface *intf = xencons->intf;
> > int sent = 0;
> >
> > cons = intf->out_cons;
> > @@ -85,13 +108,16 @@ static int __write_console(const char *data, int len)
> > intf->out_prod = prod;
> >
> > if (sent)
> > - notify_daemon();
> > + notify_daemon(xencons);
> > return sent;
> > }
> >
> > static int domU_write_console(uint32_t vtermno, const char *data, int len)
> > {
> > int ret = len;
> > + struct xencons_info *cons = vtermno_to_xencons(vtermno);
> > + if (cons == NULL)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > /*
> > * Make sure the whole buffer is emitted, polling if
> > @@ -100,7 +126,7 @@ static int domU_write_console(uint32_t vtermno, const
> > char *data, int len)
> > * kernel is crippled.
> > */
> > while (len) {
> > - int sent = __write_console(data, len);
> > + int sent = __write_console(cons, data, len);
> >
> > data += sent;
> > len -= sent;
> > @@ -114,9 +140,13 @@ static int domU_write_console(uint32_t vtermno, const
> > char *data, int len)
> >
> > static int domU_read_console(uint32_t vtermno, char *buf, int len)
> > {
> > - struct xencons_interface *intf = xencons_interface();
> > + struct xencons_interface *intf;
> > XENCONS_RING_IDX cons, prod;
> > int recv = 0;
> > + struct xencons_info *xencons = vtermno_to_xencons(vtermno);
> > + if (xencons == NULL)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + intf = xencons->intf;
> >
> > cons = intf->in_cons;
> > prod = intf->in_prod;
> > @@ -129,7 +159,7 @@ static int domU_read_console(uint32_t vtermno, char
> > *buf, int len)
> > mb(); /* read ring before consuming */
> > intf->in_cons = cons;
> >
> > - notify_daemon();
> > + notify_daemon(xencons);
> > return recv;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -172,33 +202,109 @@ static int xen_hvm_console_init(void)
> > int r;
> > uint64_t v = 0;
> > unsigned long mfn;
> > + struct xencons_info *info;
> >
> > if (!xen_hvm_domain())
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - if (xencons_if != NULL)
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + info = vtermno_to_xencons(HVC_COOKIE);
> > + if (!info) {
> > + info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct xencons_info), GFP_KERNEL |
> > __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!info)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* already configured */
> > + if (info->intf != NULL)
> > + return 0;
> >
> > r = hvm_get_parameter(HVM_PARAM_CONSOLE_EVTCHN, &v);
> > - if (r < 0)
> > + if (r < 0) {
> > + kfree(info);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > - console_evtchn = v;
> > + }
> > + info->evtchn = v;
> > hvm_get_parameter(HVM_PARAM_CONSOLE_PFN, &v);
> > - if (r < 0)
> > + if (r < 0) {
> > + kfree(info);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > mfn = v;
> > - xencons_if = ioremap(mfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE);
> > - if (xencons_if == NULL)
> > + info->intf = ioremap(mfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (info->intf == NULL) {
> > + kfree(info);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > + info->vtermno = HVC_COOKIE;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&xencons_lock);
> > + list_add_tail(&info->list, &xenconsoles);
> > + spin_unlock(&xencons_lock);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int xen_pv_console_init(void)
> > +{
> > + struct xencons_info *info;
> > +
> > + if (!xen_pv_domain())
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > + if (!xen_start_info->console.domU.evtchn)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + info = vtermno_to_xencons(HVC_COOKIE);
> > + if (!info) {
> > + info = kmalloc(sizeof(struct xencons_info), GFP_KERNEL |
> > __GFP_ZERO);
>
> Ugh. Use kzalloc here. Especially as you are testing it below (and
> kmalloc with certain CONFIG_DEBUG.. can make the the returned memory
> have bogus data.
OK
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |