[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reflect cpupool in numa node affinity
On 01/23/2012 11:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 23.01.12 at 10:51, Juergen Gross<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:@@ -365,15 +366,21 @@ void domain_update_node_affinity(structvoid domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d) { cpumask_t cpumask; + cpumask_t online_affinity;If at all possible, please don't introduce new automatic cpumask_t variables. Allocating them will of course mean that the function can fail, and that callers need to deal with the failure. (Probably a prior patch should then first convert the 'cpumask' variable.) In this case I don't think it is very complicated. Not doing anything in domain_update_node_affinity() will just produce a lower performance. So doing a return in case of an allocation failure should be fine. + cpumask_t *online;const. Okay. nodemask_t nodemask = NODE_MASK_NONE; struct vcpu *v; unsigned int node; + online = (d->cpupool == NULL) ?&cpu_online_map : d->cpupool->cpu_valid;This construct (together with its brother using 'cpupool_free_cpus') meanwhile enjoys quite a number of instances - could it get abstracted into a pair of inline functions or macros? Okay. Juergen -- Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems PDG ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967 Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |