[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Reflect cpupool in numa node affinity


  • To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:45:28 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:45:50 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=fXgDOp+ssRKX4CG+BTrjCD7kOI30EOkUFx7FqFX6up1PDekk+7bPWnf9 yBVNAFtqMSCUZl3HNfrmCeDpCDiAhNjErKErSZotN94lNM9KuZRAtC+SK 1Sran4Pi21JnIi/cD3/X3tFsisDf3yEM4J+rxshRo1ooMIM7DdTCLRqL2 glmZTd8MbKyu/rnuXlU1R+DgdbcAj8fLl7JOEK2mabmk7UPuwi4qkqNrk jxPCGykk7erliNn3gMlnzrEzioSdx;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 01/23/2012 11:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.01.12 at 10:51, Juergen Gross<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
@@ -365,15 +366,21 @@ void domain_update_node_affinity(struct
void domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d)
{
     cpumask_t cpumask;
+    cpumask_t online_affinity;
If at all possible, please don't introduce new automatic cpumask_t
variables. Allocating them will of course mean that the function can
fail, and that callers need to deal with the failure. (Probably a prior
patch should then first convert the 'cpumask' variable.)

In this case I don't think it is very complicated.
Not doing anything in domain_update_node_affinity() will just produce a
lower performance. So doing a return in case of an allocation failure should
be fine.

+    cpumask_t *online;
const.

Okay.

     nodemask_t nodemask = NODE_MASK_NONE;
     struct vcpu *v;
     unsigned int node;

+    online = (d->cpupool == NULL) ?&cpu_online_map : d->cpupool->cpu_valid;
This construct (together with its brother using 'cpupool_free_cpus')
meanwhile enjoys quite a number of instances - could it get abstracted
into a pair of inline functions or macros?

Okay.


Juergen

--
Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
PDG ES&S SWE OS6                       Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions              e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domagkstr. 28                           Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.