Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 3] libxl: extend pCPUs specification for vcpu-pin.

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 16:48 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 3] libxl: extend pCPUs 
> specification for vcpu-pin."):
> > Ok, I'm not really a "string parsing guy" but I'm interested in getting
> > better. I can try restructuring this with strtok_r and strdup... Would
> > that be better or you where thinking to something more "radical"?
> 
> Personally I'm a fan of flex although it's probably overkill for
> this.  But you should use an approach your comfortable with.
> 
> What I care most about is that whatever approach you take doesn't make
> it too easy to make and hide :-) programming mistakes, since otherwise
> parsing code often turns out to be buggy.

Can we take the version which just moves the dodgy parsee now and worry
about reworking it later? I think we'd like to see vcpu pinning in 4.2.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel