[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/12] xen: only map PV guest grants via iommu if HAS_PASSTHROUGH
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 12:38 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.01.12 at 13:06, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > xen/Rules.mk | 1 + > > xen/arch/arm/dummy.S | 2 -- > > xen/common/grant_table.c | 6 ++++++ > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/Rules.mk b/xen/Rules.mk > > index e25e8d4..ce88316 100644 > > --- a/xen/Rules.mk > > +++ b/xen/Rules.mk > > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ CFLAGS-$(perfc_arrays) += -DPERF_ARRAYS > > CFLAGS-$(lock_profile) += -DLOCK_PROFILE > > CFLAGS-$(HAS_ACPI) += -DHAS_ACPI > > CFLAGS-$(HAS_TMEM) += -DHAS_TMEM > > +CFLAGS-$(HAS_PASSTHROUGH) += -DHAS_PASSTHROUGH > > CFLAGS-$(frame_pointer) += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -DCONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > > > ifneq ($(max_phys_cpus),) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S b/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S > > index 5010619..e858613 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/dummy.S > > @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ DUMMY(gmfn_to_mfn); > > DUMMY(gnttab_clear_flag); > > DUMMY(gnttab_mark_dirty); > > DUMMY(hypercall_create_continuation); > > -DUMMY(iommu_map_page); > > -DUMMY(iommu_unmap_page); > > DUMMY(is_iomem_page); > > DUMMY(max_page); > > DUMMY(node_online_map); > > diff --git a/xen/common/grant_table.c b/xen/common/grant_table.c > > index b024016..1798fcd 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c > > +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c > > @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ static int _set_status(unsigned gt_version, > > return _set_status_v2(domid, readonly, mapflag, shah, act, status); > > } > > > > +#ifdef HAS_PASSTHROUGH > > static void mapcount( > > struct domain *ld, unsigned long mfn, > > unsigned int *wrc, unsigned int *rdc) > > @@ -456,6 +457,7 @@ static void mapcount( > > rcu_unlock_domain(rd); > > } > > } > > +#endif > > > > /* > > * Returns 0 if TLB flush / invalidate required by caller. > > @@ -662,6 +664,7 @@ __gnttab_map_grant_ref( > > goto undo_out; > > } > > > > +#ifdef HAS_PASSTHROUGH > > if ( !is_hvm_domain(ld) && need_iommu(ld) ) > > Wouldn't #define-ing need_iommu() to 0 in the ARM headers achieve > the same effect, without cluttering common code? Yes. I'd thought there were other uses of need_iommu but in fact they are all in x86. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |