Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10882: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.01.12 at 19:19, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 10882 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10882/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-i386-i386-xl-win         7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-i386-i386-win            7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 10649

Finally spotted an actual crash in the logs here, pointing at a relatively
obvious problem: guest_iommu_mmio_range() is apparently lacking a
NULL check. Was this code ever tested on an Intel system?

I'll add this, but will first check whether I can spot other functions
missing such.

Jan

>  test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3    7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3  7 windows-install fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-amd64-win          7 windows-install  fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       7 windows-install  fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1  7 windows-install fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1    7 windows-install  fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-win           7 windows-install  fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7 windows-install fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3  7 windows-install  fail in 10875 REGR. vs. 
> 10649



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel