[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V4 0/5] kvm : Paravirt-spinlock support for KVM guests
On 01/16/2012 07:19 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: On 01/16/2012 03:43 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:Dbench: Throughput is in MB/sec NRCLIENTS BASE BASE+patch %improvement mean (sd) mean (sd) 8 1.101190 (0.875082) 1.700395 (0.846809) 54.4143 16 1.524312 (0.120354) 1.477553 (0.058166) -3.06755 32 2.143028 (0.157103) 2.090307 (0.136778) -2.46012So on a very contended system we're actually slower? Is this expected?I think, the result is interesting because its PLE machine. I have to experiment more with parameters, SPIN_THRESHOLD, and also may be ple_gap and ple_window.Perhaps the PLE stuff fights with the PV stuff? I also think so. The slight advantage in PLE, with current patch would be that, we are be able to say " This is the next guy who should probably get his turn". But If total number of unnecessary "halt exits" disadvantage dominates above advantage, then we see degradation. One clarification in above benchmarking is, Dbench is runsimultaneously on all (8 vcpu) 3 guests. So we already have 1:3 overcommit when we run 8 clients of dbench. after that it was just increasing number of clients. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |