Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-i386-i386-xl

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Durrant writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete 
test-i386-i386-xl"):
> It all seems to be gated correctly on the whether the VM is HVM and/or the 
> existence of the appropriate save record.

Well, the bisector, when it fingers a changeset, is pretty reliable.
The revision graph shows that it tried each of 3c4c5df2cd0e and
92630d4b093e three times and got consistent results.

So as you were the author of the original patch, can you please try to
reproduce the problem and fix it ?

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel