Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 compile option

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:19:11PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > If the root complaint is that "customers think that anything set in
> > > .config is a supported feature", then the solutions are to support
> > > all
> > > the features in .config, re-educate the customers that they're wrong,
> > > or
> > > maintain a local patch to do this stuff.
> > 
> > If only re-educating people was free, like preempting questions is.
> > Local patches are of course always an option, and perhaps in this
> > case it's the best one. However, I think we already made a case for
> > better xen configurability for the driver domains, so I'm not 100%
> 
> Could you repost those backend patches please? At this point I am not
> sure which one we have discarded?

hm, I was thinking in terms of the XenBus ones. We had somewhere in this
converstion something about seperating the backend's from depending on
CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 as they can be run in any domain nowadays.

> 
> > convinced my initial patch (making dom0 configurable) isn't worthy
> > of upstream. Also, I didn't see any comments on my v2[*] of that
> > patch, which I believe satisfies the menu complexity issue and
> > brings in more configurability. That said, I'm about to reply to
> > that patch myself, since there's an issue with it.
> > 
> > Drew
> > 
> > [*] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/14635
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel