Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 13/25] arm: domain_build

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/01/12 17:59, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> +int construct_dom0(struct domain *d)
> +{
[...]
> +    printk("Routing peripheral interrupts to guest\n");
> +    /* TODO Get from device tree */

Can you route interrupt 34 (timer0) to dom0 as well?  Current mainline
kernels are using this timer.

David

>From 88148e85b2d8d9bf60564d4b5eb2ac73d8389fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:21:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: route timer0 interrupt to dom0

Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index c36b888..cbbc0b9 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ int construct_dom0(struct domain *d)

     printk("Routing peripheral interrupts to guest\n");
     /* TODO Get from device tree */
+    gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, 34, "timer0");
     /*gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, 37, "uart0"); -- XXX used by Xen*/
     gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, 38, "uart1");
     gic_route_irq_to_guest(d, 39, "uart2");
-- 
1.7.2.5

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel