Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, v2] Xen: consolidate and simplify struct xenbus_driver instantiation

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:38:21PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:44 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 11:57 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 11:51 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > >>> On 22.12.11 at 10:57, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:08 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > >> The 'name', 'owner', and 'mod_name' members are redundant with the
> > > > >> identically named fields in the 'driver' sub-structure. Rather than
> > > > >> switching each instance to specify these fields explicitly, introduce
> > > > >> a macro to simplify this.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Eliminate further redundancy by allowing the drvname argument to
> > > > >> DEFINE_XENBUS_DRIVER() to be blank (in which case the first entry 
> > > > >> from
> > > > >> the ID table will be used for .driver.name).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Any reason not to always use DRV_NAME here (which is generally a bit
> > > > > more specific e.g. "xen-foofront" rather than "foo") and rely on the 
> > > > > id
> > > > > table for the shorter names used in xenstore?
> > > > 
> > > > That would imply that DRV_NAME is always defined, but I don't
> > > > see this being the case.
> > > 
> > > My mistake, I thought it was a Kbuild thing.
> > 
> > You're maybe thinking of KBUILD_MODNAME.
> 
> Yes, I think I was.

Ian, are you OK with this patch? I think Jan needs to repost once more with the
"pciback" -> DRV_NAME change and then it is OK?

I've tested it with all backends, except the pciback one, and I see no 
regressions
with 'xl' or 'xm' toolstack.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel