[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 07/25] xen/common/Makefile: introduce HAS_CPUFREQ, HAS_PCI, HAS_PASSTHROUGH, HAS_NS16550
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 12:05 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 07.12.11 at 12:24, Stefano Stabellini > > >>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> >>> On 06.12.11 at 19:19, <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > > >> > - make the compilation of ns16550.c depend upon HAS_NS16550; > > >> > > > >> > - make the compilation of cpufreq depend upon HAS_CPUFREQ; > > >> > > > >> > - make the compilation of pci depend upon HAS_PCI; > > >> > > > >> > - make the compilation of passthrough depend upon HAS_PASSTHROUGH; > > >> > > > >> > - make the compilation of kexec.o depend on HAS_ACPI. > > >> > > >> How are kexec and ACPI connected to one another? > > > > > > Today kexec implementation is dependent on ACPI. > > > > The only dependency I can spot is the call to acpi_dmar_reinstate(), > > which could clearly get an inline stub on platforms that don't have > > ACPI (or pass-through). > > It is better than I thought. I am compiling kexec too now. Even if it can be made to compile it can't work unless someone writes the actual moving parts which is a fair bit of work. I suggest we leave this to one side for now and define HAS_KEXEC as False. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |