Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 10032: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable test] 10032: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 10032 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10032/
...
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel  7 redhat-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 9956
>  test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd  7 redhat-install             fail REGR. vs. 
> 9956
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       7 windows-install            fail REGR. vs. 
> 9956
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1  7 windows-install           fail REGR. vs. 
> 9956
>  test-i386-i386-xl-win         7 windows-install            fail REGR. vs. 
> 9956

It looks like something has completely broken HVM.  My bisector is
working on it and should report later today.

Maybe we should stop throwing things into the tree until we get a
pass and push.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel