[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 9805: regressions - FAIL



On 17.11.2011 10:06, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 17/11/2011 08:32, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is due to a bad backport of c/s 24007:0526644ad2a6: In -unstable,
>> evtchn_unmask() must be called with d->event_lock held, while in 4.1
>> the function acquires the lock (and now gets called with the lock already
>> held from do_physdev_op()'s case PHYSDEVOP_eoi). The change dates
>> back to 23573:584c2e5e03d9, which hardly is a candidate for backporting
>> (but maybe the locking change needs to be pulled out of there).
> 
> Interestingly, Ubuntu's 4.1 fix has exactly the same problem.
> 

Hm, yes we should. I am pretty sure I hit that code path often enough, Wonder
why I never saw any dead lock there...

--Stefan

> I'll revert the patch until someone has time to actually implement and test
> a working patch against our vanilla 4.1-testing tree.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.