[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] default value of extra_dom0_irqs
>>> On 16.11.11 at 14:00, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16/11/11 11:52, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 16.11.11 at 04:40, Shu Wu <superwushu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> In the changes I noticed the extra_dom0_irqs, which should be 0 by default >>> in r20142, was set to 256 in r20143, and caused default number of Dom0's >>> nr_pirq to exceed 256. Maybe this prevent IRQ of HP RAID controller, I >>> don't quite know about, though. After I set it to 32 (the same number as >>> extra_guest_irqs) the cciss.ko worked well. Although I could set this value >>> by "extra_guest_irqs=32,32" in boot param, there are still problem: >> That would hint at the IRQ number (presumably an MSI one) getting >> stored in too narrow a field somewhere in the kernel. > > Is your kernel being built with per-cpu IDTs, or is it with one shared IDT? pv kernels don't have any IDT. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |