[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: clean up __io_apic_eoi()
Irrespective of the IO-APIC vector sharing suppression patch just sent the logic in this function needs to iterate over all RTEs, since multiple pins within an IO-APIC may still use the same vector. This is due to the irq_2_pin[] mapping not necessarily being 1:1. Consequently we should remove the commented out code as well as the respective comments provisioned for the point in time when vector sharing between unrelated RTEs would be disabled. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c @@ -281,36 +281,15 @@ static void __io_apic_eoi(unsigned int a /* If pin is unknown, search for it */ if ( pin == -1 ) { - unsigned int p; - for ( p = 0; p < nr_ioapic_entries[apic]; ++p ) + for ( pin = 0; pin < nr_ioapic_entries[apic]; ++pin ) { - entry = __ioapic_read_entry(apic, p, TRUE); + entry = __ioapic_read_entry(apic, pin, TRUE); if ( entry.vector == vector ) - { - pin = p; - /* break; */ - - /* Here should be a break out of the loop, but at the - * Xen code doesn't actually prevent multiple IO-APIC - * entries being assigned the same vector, so EOI all - * pins which have the correct vector. - * - * Remove the following code when the above assertion - * is fulfilled. */ - __io_apic_eoi(apic, vector, p); - } + __io_apic_eoi(apic, vector, pin); } /* If search fails, nothing to do */ - /* if ( pin == -1 ) */ - - /* Because the loop wasn't broken out of (see comment above), - * all relevant pins have been EOI, so we can always return. - * - * Re-instate the if statement above when the Xen logic has been - * fixed.*/ - return; } Attachment:
x86-ioapic-EOI-cleanup.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |