[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture
I'd be happy with 'addr' or 'opaque' or somesuch if 'raw' is distasteful. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 09 November 2011 14:49 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jeremy@xxxxxxxx; kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:11:22AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > Annie, > > > > Comments inline below... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > [snip] > > > -static struct grant_entry *shared; > > > +static union { > > > + struct grant_entry_v1 *v1; > > > + void *ring_addr; > > > +} shared; > > > + > > > > 'ring_addr' seems like the wrong name here; how about 'raw'? > > Or 'ring'. I asked Annie to change it from 'raw' to something else > and the first thing that came in my mind was 'ring_addr'. But this > does not point to a ring, so the 'ring' part is wrong. > > Point here is to make it descriptive. 'raw' does not carry meaning > of _what_ it is suppose to do. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |