[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/6] vtd: Refactor iotlb flush code
Allen, You are probably talking about __intel_iommu_iotlb_flush. This function takes a range of address to flush. I haven't found a function in the vtd code to invalidate a range on address without doing a loop of flush_iotlb_psi, so I thought that the most efficient and quick way to flush a range would be to use a domain selective invalidation. Jean On 08/11 03:10, Kay, Allen M wrote: > Jean, > > The original code does not call iommu_flush_iotlb_dsi(). What is the reason > the refractored code need to use domain selective invalidation? > > Allen > ----- > > + if ( page_count > 1 || gfn == -1 ) > + { > + if ( iommu_flush_iotlb_dsi(iommu, iommu_domid, > + 0, flush_dev_iotlb) ) > + iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu); > + } > + else > + { > + if ( iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(iommu, iommu_domid, > + (paddr_t)gfn << PAGE_SHIFT_4K, 0, > + !dma_old_pte_present, flush_dev_iotlb) ) > + iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu); > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean Guyader [mailto:jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 10:25 AM > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: tim@xxxxxxx; Kay, Allen M; Jean Guyader > Subject: [PATCH 1/6] vtd: Refactor iotlb flush code > > > Factorize the iotlb flush code from map_page and unmap_page into it's own > function. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |