[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] xen: map foreign pages for shared rings by updating the PTEs directly



>>> On 29.09.11 at 18:45, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29/09/11 17:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 29.09.11 at 17:53, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> [Resend as requested by Konrad.]
>>>
>>> This series of patches allows the vmalloc_sync_all() to be removed
>>> from alloc_vm_area() by getting the hypervisor to update the PTEs (in
>>> init_mm) directly rather than having the hypervisor look in the
>>> current page tables to find the PTEs.
>>>
>>> Once the hypervisor has updated the PTEs, the normal mechanism of
>>> syncing the page tables after a fault works as expected.
>> 
>> Did you actually test that, and namely the case where alloc_vm_area()
>> would result in a new top level page directory entry to get populated?
>>
>> I cannot see how this new entry would propagate into other mm-s, and
>> hence I cannot see how you can do away with calling vmalloc_sync_all()
>> just by changing how leaf page table entries get populated.
> 
> I don't think this new behaviour of alloc_vm_area() is any different
> from how a regular vmalloc() works.

Of course not. Callers of vmalloc() need to use vmalloc_sync_all() too
before it is permitted to access the allocated space from an NMI
handler or pass it into a hypercall.

> vmalloc_fault() copies the page table entries from init_mm into the
> current MM (on 32-bit it calls vmalloc_sync_one() which makes it
> obviously correct I think).

No, vmalloc_fault() copies pmd-s (32-bit) or pgd-s (64-bit), but never
pte-s. Avoiding this to be done in a fault (precisely for the NMI and
hypercall cases named above) is what vmalloc_sync_all() was
introduced for (really, the hypercall aspect didn't matter back then,
and alloc_vm_area() didn't exist outside of Xenolinux then either).

So eliminating it from alloc_vm_area() just pushes the need to call it
to all callers that may have the obtained space accessed in NMI
context (none at present, as only Xen code appears to call this
function) or want to pass it to a hypercall without running on init_mm.

Just to repeat the essence of my first reply: Fiddling with how pte-s
get populated can not possibly eliminate the need to call a function
that populates top level page directory entries (pmd-s/pgd-s).

Jan

>>> This mechanism doesn't currently work on the ia64 port as that does
>>> not support the GNTMAP_contains_pte flag.
>>>
>>> David




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.