[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen
On 09/16/2011 01:43 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote: >>>>> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that >>>>> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063 >>>>> >>>>> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified >>>>> are shell scripts. >>> >>>> Yep, links here: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728775 >>> The Fedora update system reports this is fixed in grub2-1.99-6.fc16. >>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658387 >>> Peter Jones submitted a new grubby package yesterday. This seems to fix >>> bug #658387 (i.e., new-kernel-pkg creates a Dom0-style grub.cfg entry >>> if /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains "HYPERVISOR=/boot/xen.gz"). >>> >>> I have not yet tested this on Fedora 16. However, I did test on Fedora >>> 15. In this case, bug #668063 is still in effect. That is, grubby creates >>> most of a GRUB record, but the "module initramfs-..." entry is missing. >>> >>> Has anyone yet tested this new grubby package on Fedora 16 yet? Does >>> using GRUB 2 makes #668063 irrelevant? > I believe so (the irrelevant part). But the functionality part of grubby > picking > up /etc/sysconfig/kernel and making that kernel the default is not in Grub2 - > so > not sure how that can be addressed. >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668063 >>> I just added some more description to this bug. >> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to >> boot as guests on Xen hosts: >> >> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation >> where the virtual host is running a supported Xen implementation" >> >> I really don't have much knowledge of Xen and haven't followed this >> discussion closely, but do any currently-known bugs prevent this? If so, >> please flag them up so they can be considered as Beta blockers...thanks! > Somehow the xen-kbdfront driver is not included in the initrd image > (I think) - and we end with anaconda but can't type anything. I've been > trying > to figure out how to inject said module in the install initrd to see if that > is > really the problem but running in roadblocks (like xz 5.1.1alpha or 5.0.3 > complains > about corrupt image, or I've no idea how to make driver disks). I saw the same thing and worked around it by booting with "vnc lang=en_US.UTF-8 keymap=us" which eliminiates the need to enter anything before it starts X on a vnc server. But it doesn't really address the original problem. I spent last Friday trying to get it to do an HVM install, but that seemed to be very much a Xen problem. It wouldn't accept keyboard input or find its emulated devices properly until I added "acpi=off", or set "acpi=0" in the Xen config. But even then it refused to see my HD image, even though the BIOS could list it. I got stuck at that point, and am now (successfully) doing a PV install (with the above workaround). J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |