[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix PV CPUID virtualization of XSave
>>> On 16.09.11 at 02:46, Haitao Shan <maillists.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Keir, > > The patch will fix XSave CPUID virtualization for PV guests. The XSave > area size returned by CPUID leaf D is changed dynamically depending on > the XCR0. Tools/libxc only assigns a static value. The fix will adjust > xsave area size during runtime. > > Note: This fix is already in HVM cpuid virtualization. And Dom0 is not > affected, either. > > Signed-off-by: Shan Haitao <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Shan Haitao > > diff -r 5fe770c8a8a3 xen/arch/x86/traps.c > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Tue Sep 06 15:49:40 2011 +0100 > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Wed Sep 07 02:09:12 2011 +0800 > @@ -770,6 +770,30 @@ static void pv_cpuid(struct cpu_user_reg > { > if ( !cpuid_hypervisor_leaves(a, c, &a, &b, &c, &d) ) > domain_cpuid(current->domain, a, c, &a, &b, &c, &d); > + > + switch ( a ) > + { > + case 0xd: > + { > + unsigned int sub_leaf, _eax, _ebx, _ecx, _edx; > + /* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features > */ > + if ( c == 0 && current->arch.xcr0 ) > + { > + /* reset EBX to default value first */ > + b = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE; > + for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 64; sub_leaf++ ) Shouldn't the upper bound be 63 here (as bit 63 serves a different purpose, and if that bit was set code changes would be required in various other places)? Jan > + { > + if ( !(current->arch.xcr0 & (1ULL << sub_leaf)) ) > + continue; > + domain_cpuid(current->domain, a, c, &_eax, &_ebx, &_ecx, > + &_edx); > + if ( (_eax + _ebx) > b ) > + b = _eax + _ebx; > + } > + } > + break; > + } > + } > goto out; > } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |