Re: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.09.11 at 11:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Keir,
> 
> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
> migrating line interrupts") in both trees.
> 
> I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf()
> should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's
> already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output.

Also shouldn't we have a backport of 23112:84e3706df07a ("Passthrough:
disable bus-mastering on any card that causes an IOMMU fault.") in the
4.0 tree (even if it doesn't fully address the problem, yet - that's the
case in the other trees too)?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel