Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 08/09/2011 10:10, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Andrew: I think we have to leave this vector where it is, but you could add
>> a comment explaining why it is so, in your cleanup patchset.
>> 
>>  -- Keir 
> 
> Wow I was having a slow day - I was thinking that
> IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR was the first high priority vector.
> 
> In which case it should probably stay at its current vector, but
> FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR should probably be bumped up, as it is no longer a
> vector dynamically allocated to guests.

Sounds reasonable.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel