[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED


  • To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:35:07 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:36:13 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcxV4MAMMRK8QuEBgUupNj2wzlEH3w==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

On 08/08/2011 16:04, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> xen.org writes ("[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 8289: tolerable FAIL -
> PUSHED"):
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl         5 xen-boot                  fail    like 8244
> 
> This is not a heisenbug.  It is a reproducible failure to boot on
> certain hardware.  It just looks like a heisenbug to the tester
> because it doesn't runs the test on the same host each time.
> 
> It passes on
>   earwig, gall-mite, itch-mite               All of which are Intel machines
> It fails on
>   leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse      All of which are AMD machines

Can you set up a bisection run on one of the AMD boxes?

 -- Keir

> Here is an example of a failure:
> 
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8289/test-amd64-i386-xl/info.
> html
> 
> The serial log just stops after this:
> 
> Aug  3 19:40:02.917190 (XEN) Processor #21 0:8 APIC version 16
> Aug  3 19:40:02.924192 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0xff] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
> Aug  3 19:40:02.932202 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge
> lint[0x1])
> Aug  3 19:40:02.940214 (XEN) Overriding APIC driver with bigsmp
> Aug  3 19:40:02.940234 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x16] address[0xfec00000]
> gsi_base[0])
> Aug  3 19:40:02.948192 (XEN) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 22, version 17, address
> 0xfec00000, GSI 0-15
> Aug  3 19:40:02.957194 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x17] address[0xfec01000]
> gsi_base[16])
> Aug  3 19:40:02.968200 (XEN) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 23, version 17, address
> 0xfec01000, GSI 16-31
> Aug  3 19:40:02.976203 (XEN) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x18] address[0xfec02000]
> gsi_base[32])
> Aug  3 19:40:02.977192 (XEN) IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 24, version 17, address
> 0xfec02000, GSI 32-47
> Aug  3 19:40:02.985195 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2
> dfl dfl)
> Aug  3 19:40:02.996197 (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9
> low level)
> Aug  3 19:40:03.001201 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
> Aug  3 19:40:03.005185 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
> Aug  3 19:40:03.012196 (XEN) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
> Aug  3 19:40:03.013185 (XEN) Enabling APIC mode:  Phys.  Using 3 I/O APICs
> Aug  3 19:40:03.021188 (XEN) ACPI: HPET id: 0x1166a201 base: 0xfed00000
> 
> The test runner's attempt to get debug key output (which start at
> 19:45:12) didn't succeed.  Results on other machines are similar.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.