Re: [Xen-devel] Proposal: vif-local [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

W. Michael Petullo writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: New 4.0.2 and 4.1.1 release 
candidates"):
> Is it too late to merge the patch discussed at
>   http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-05/msg00306.html

We don't generally apply patches directly to the stable trees (4.0 and
4.1, at the moment).  We like them to come through xen-unstable first.

When you submitted your patch, you got this reply:

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Proposal: vif-local"):
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 18:10 +0100, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > Allow for site-specific hooks that will be executed after Xen initializes
> > a vif. This allows an administrator to specify custom firewall rules or
> > other special configuration parameters.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: W. Michael Petullo <mike@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is against 4.1? can you check that it applies to xen-unstable.hg
> please, other than that:
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

Can you confirm that your patch applies and works correctly against
xen-unstable.hg ?

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel