[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL


  • To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:37:56 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:38:44 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=TUZFk5BF0TAnuId9BGE+H3wgewm1GxPEOFpY1Ufv/CUvC5BbHt/Q2t3bzYW/oTnj8L NeOwyo2YdUxMIxCkT4AM/tdOO/jU3HQcYsGG7YfNhk8hkTor5r/Pa5DRThVoyfeEyvyi 5dV5yNF+UdTbvkUTm5x6B8IqdOQb2nKxctxxk=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcwZXXFGxXi1caltKkuMd4TX6k5r1QAAfGz7
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL

On 23/05/2011 16:24, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 23/05/2011 16:08, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I wrote:
>>> At top level:
>>> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-unused-but-set-variable"
>> 
>> How about this fix.
> 
> I've been fiddling with a similar principle but much smaller patch (see
> below). But it's failing for me in the same way as yours -- *all* optional
> flags disappear from my CFLAGS (e.g., -Wno-unused-but-set-variable, which my
> gcc-4.5.1 definitely does support).
> 
> So I'm still scratching my head on this one... :-(

Here's a nice short one that seems to work for me. It does rely on the
compiler emitting the word 'unrecognized' iff the option under test is
unrecognised. I strongly suspect this is a safe bet. Unfortunately I can't
see any way around grepping the output, since otherwise we can't distinguish
the integer-assignment-to-pointer warning from the unrecognised-option
warning.

I'll refrain from applying it until we have general agreement.

 -- Keir

diff -r 0f670f5146c8 Config.mk
--- a/Config.mk    Sat May 21 07:55:46 2011 +0100
+++ b/Config.mk    Mon May 23 16:32:43 2011 +0100
@@ -72,8 +72,9 @@ PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG ?= --prefix="$(PREFIX)
 
 # cc-option: Check if compiler supports first option, else fall back to
second.
 # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,$(CC),-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586)
-cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`$(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc \
-              /dev/null 2>&1`"; then echo "$(2)"; else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
+cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`echo 'void*p=1;' | \
+              $(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc - 2>&1 | grep unrecognized`"; \
+              then echo "$(2)"; else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
 
 # cc-option-add: Add an option to compilation flags, but only if supported.
 # Usage: $(call cc-option-add CFLAGS,CC,-march=winchip-c6)


> 
> diff -r 0f670f5146c8 Config.mk
> --- a/Config.mk Sat May 21 07:55:46 2011 +0100
> +++ b/Config.mk Mon May 23 16:16:54 2011 +0100
> @@ -72,8 +72,10 @@ PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG ?= --prefix="$(PREFIX)
>  
>  # cc-option: Check if compiler supports first option, else fall back to
> second.
>  # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,$(CC),-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586)
> -cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`$(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc \
> -              /dev/null 2>&1`"; then echo "$(2)"; else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
> +#cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`$(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc \
> +#              /dev/null 2>&1`"; then echo "$(2)"; else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
> +cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`echo 'void*p=1;' | \
> +              $(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc - 2>&1`"; then echo "$(2)";
> else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
>  
>  # cc-option-add: Add an option to compilation flags, but only if supported.
>  # Usage: $(call cc-option-add CFLAGS,CC,-march=winchip-c6)
> 
> 
>> Ian.
>> 
>> diff -r 0f670f5146c8 Config.mk
>> --- a/Config.mk Sat May 21 07:55:46 2011 +0100
>> +++ b/Config.mk Mon May 23 16:07:59 2011 +0100
>> @@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG ?= --prefix="$(PREFIX)
>>  
>>  # cc-option: Check if compiler supports first option, else fall back to
>> second.
>>  # Usage: cflags-y += $(call cc-option,$(CC),-march=winchip-c6,-march=i586)
>> -cc-option = $(shell if test -z "`$(1) $(2) -S -o /dev/null -xc \
>> -              /dev/null 2>&1`"; then echo "$(2)"; else echo "$(3)"; fi ;)
>> +cc-option = $(shell $(XEN_ROOT)/config/test-cc-option.sh $(1) $(2) $(3))
>>  
>>  # cc-option-add: Add an option to compilation flags, but only if supported.
>>  # Usage: $(call cc-option-add CFLAGS,CC,-march=winchip-c6)
>> diff -r 0f670f5146c8 config/test-cc-option.sh
>> --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
>> +++ b/config/test-cc-option.sh Mon May 23 16:07:59 2011 +0100
>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +set -e
>> +
>> +cc="$1"
>> +opt="$2"
>> +alt="$3"
>> +
>> +case "$opt" in
>> +-Wno-*)
>> +   # Sadly a broken implementation of the fix to GCC PR 28322
>> +   # (actually shipped eg in Debian lenny) makes it hard to spot
>> +   # whether the compiler recognises a -Wno-foo option without
>> +   # generating a warning for some other reason.
>> +
>> +   input="${0%-cc-option.sh}-cc-warning.c"
>> +   if $cc $opt -Wreturn-type -Wno-error -S -o /dev/null "$input" \
>> +           >/dev/null 2>&1; then
>> +       res="$opt"
>> +   else
>> +       res="$alt"
>> +   fi
>> +   ;;
>> +*)
>> +    if test -z "`$cc $opt $nerr -S -o /dev/null -xc $input 2>&1`"; then
>> +        res="$opt"
>> +    else
>> +        res="$alt"
>> +    fi
>> +    ;;
>> +esac
>> +printf "%s\n" "$res"
>> diff -r 0f670f5146c8 config/test-cc-warning.c
>> --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
>> +++ b/config/test-cc-warning.c Mon May 23 16:07:59 2011 +0100
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +extern int bogus(void);
>> +int bogus(void) { }
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.