Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went in.

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Monday, May 16, 2011, 6:49:18 PM, you wrote:

> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:27:05AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 05/15/2011 08:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>> >>>> Great work everyone. :)
>> >>> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
>> >>> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
>> >>> on Monday :-)
>> >> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
>> >>
>> >>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>> >>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>> >>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
>> >>> important
>> >>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>> >> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm 
>> >> work.
>> >> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer 
>> >> period :-)
>> >>
>> > At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi 
>> > patches..
>> >
>> > Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream? 
>> 
>> Konrad has a set of acpi patches from the Virtual Computer folks I think.

> <nods> In process of creating a branch of them.


Ahh nice :-)
Something to test again ...

Will give it a spin when the branch arrives and i have the time !

--
Sander


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel