[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: drop anti-dependency on X86_VISWS
- To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:20:22 -0700
- Cc: "randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx" <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, "eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx" <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pazke@xxxxxxxxx" <pazke@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:21:18 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On 04/09/2011 03:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Actually it does - see the "#ifndef CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" section
>>> in asm/cmpxchg_32.h.
>> Hm, OK. Still, I'm happiest with that dependency in case someone
>> knobbles the cpu to exclude cmpxchg and breaks things.
> Dropping the TSC patch is sensible though?
You mean dropping the TSC dependency? Yes, I think so.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
