[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools

To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:25:08 +0100
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:25:46 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: 
tools"):
> If we are dropping xend in this release cycle, why would we bother taking
> new features for it? In fact, why is xend even still in the tree? :-)

One reason we might like to keep it in the tree for now is that it
will give us somewhere to try out bugfixes proposed for backporting to
4.1.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] How can I use grant table in domainU?
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] AMD IOMMU: p2m table changes
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Nested Virtualization: tools
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] reset PV devices in crash kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.