Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable: check_barrier not declared on 32bit

To: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:35:48 +0100

Cc:

Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:36:26 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=WbBYOD6hVIrdnIOYjWoK4NXYZLbRocAtXcci5HoUXcFDvOltWAV8AgE4tV/09Dp9IV ZzDqExh6xuKS96TjrnWGRBoOFtodkzaueZbNy8n0a2nXxM0oW/77Ebm+OvzJw1WjOMnQ /9HUegOOwPqwWsjahvcB76sb5CuBX76pBBcAg=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thread-index: AcvuJvn16qbQliZYz0GtStHW0TrGmw==

Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable: check_barrier not declared on 32bit

On 29/03/2011 16:27, "Olaf Hering" <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Current xen-unstable fails to build on 32bit with: > > spinlock.c: In function '_spin_barrier': > spinlock.c:219: error: implicit declaration of function 'check_barrier' > make[3]: *** [spinlock.o] Error 1 I broke the debug=n (non-debug) build. Fixed by c/s 23108. It's probably a good idea to do dev builds with the (default) debug=y, by the way. Thanks, Keir > Olaf > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.