[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch

To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:11:31 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:24 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Keir Fraser writes ("[Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 
4.2 development branch"):
> With 4.1 branched I'd like to raise this topic again. Does anyone have a
> strong argument for keeping the 32-bit x86 target alive?

"Mini" laptops without 64-bit support are available for sale from many
vendors including Toshiba, Asus, Acer, etc.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- [Xen-devel] Re: PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch
  - From: Christian Tramnitz
- Re: [Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- [Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: serial console driver using release_irq()/setup_irq() on suspend/resume
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] L1[0x1fb] = 0000000000000000 which faults on one type of machine but on another works?
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] PROPOSAL: Remove 32-bit x86 host support in 4.2 development branch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.