[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Merging xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 ..


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Goetz <tcgoetz@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:29:40 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 05:36:31 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=GNDqo8KfeQH+9/CJrTTbnJ4uxk84QKmI2BezVNn5OXVSgMnHm6snuG6+CkBAraTBbV vcZqTN2sRXjdxlhKmbCBmouly4fJuxScpap7lukii2UK9CntONI+4Z03h77vK+LEBAic n9pZCzKodU19LZ6+2YmapBcZXTtCTinZ2D7RU=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:39 PM, xen-devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:24:35 -0500
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Merging xen/dom0/backend/blktap2  ..
> To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        Jeremy Fitzhardinge
>       <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,      "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>       <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20110310182435.GB7729@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stodden wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:31 -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:33 +0000, Daniel Stodden wrote:
>>>> is an overall pita and I've had the pleasure several times now.
>>> 
>>> Merging it into what? xen/stable-2.6.32.x or some newer upstream version
>>> based tree?
>> 
>> Newer upstream. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. It's certainly not a common
>> operation, I was just suprised how much garbage is involved.
> 
> There is another party that is interested in doing this too, so it might
> be a good idea to compare ideas. Let me ping them to see where they are.
> 
> But putting aside the blktap2 driver - what about that ugly #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> piece of code that went in the generic code. Is that gone?
> 
> I would think that the first path would be to post patches that introduce
> the required infrastructure. For that thought you might want to wait when
> the merge window opens and Linus starts pulling Stefano's and my tree. At 
> that point
> a lot of the infrastructure backends should be in. Or if you like, you can
> take a merge of my #linux-next and Stefano's #linux-next and use that as a 
> base.
> 
> I've also up-ported blkback to 2.6.38 - look in devel/xen-blkback-v1 to
> see what I needed to do use the M2P/P2M override mechanism.
> 
> 

Konrad may be referring to me. I'm working on merging blktap2 into his 
stable/next-2.6.38 tree. I have Dom0 loopback working and have started on the 
foreign pages case. I have a PV linux guest coming up reading it's partition 
table and filesystem, then crashing. I've done this by putting the VM_FORIEGN 
bit back in. I plan to replace that with something more suitable to PVOPs once 
it is up and working.


---
Tom Goetz
tcgoetz@xxxxxxxxx





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.