[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 8] Xen: remove run_in_exception_handler() and recode its only caller
At 16:00 +0000 on 07 Mar (1299513606), Keir Fraser wrote: > On 07/03/2011 15:56, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > At 15:38 +0000 on 07 Mar (1299512321), Tim Deegan wrote: > >> At 15:15 +0000 on 07 Mar (1299510944), Keir Fraser wrote: > >>> On 07/03/2011 15:05, "Keir Fraser" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Like the attached patch (against latest tip). > >> > >> Sorry, I had missed that other user. I'll see if I can find a way to > >> make clang use the function address directly; if not, I'd be inclined to > >> have dump_execution_state have its own ID anyway, to keep %rax valid(er) > >> in BUG()s. > > > > Turns out to be very straightforward: another level of indirection makes > > the parser happy. If it's OK with you, I'll revert 22987:3147f2d1c6fb > > and apply this instead: > > If you've successfully both build- and run-tested it with gcc then it's fine > with me. It needs testing as it's a moderately skanky construct in the first > place. I have, and at least with 64bit gcc 4.4.5 dump_execution_state() still works fine. :) Tim. > -- Keir > > > diff -r 3147f2d1c6fb xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h > > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h Mon Mar 07 15:47:59 2011 +0000 > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/bug.h Mon Mar 07 15:48:32 2011 +0000 > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct bug_frame { > > asm volatile ( \ > > "ud2 ; ret %0" BUG_STR(1) \ > > : : "i" (BUGFRAME_run_fn), \ > > - "i" (fn) ) > > + "i" (&(fn)) ) > > > > #define WARN() \ > > asm volatile ( \ > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tim. > > -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |