[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
Keir, Thanks for the clarification. D. From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 6:08:05 PM Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85 On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all! > > Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as > suggested back in January by Tim Deegan? Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1. -- Keir > TIA > > > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000 > From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview > To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote: >> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen. >> This is the seventh patch series. > > Thanks for this. I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12 > (hap-on-hap) separately. Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie > for patches 1-8. > > Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1 > branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree. > > Cheers, > > Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |