[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:43:37 -0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:44:36 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Is there a reason behind libxl not accepting tap2:.. disk format, while xend 
seems to? I know the latter is being phased out slowly, but IIRC, with 4.0.1, 
we moved to tap2 addressing explicitly.

Shriram
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen and incorporating event channels in to nr_irqs
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Xen and incorporating event channels in to nr_irqs
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] tap vs tap2 (libxl & xend)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.