[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up
>>> On 16.02.11 at 15:26, "Zhang, Fengzhe" <fengzhe.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up > > Xen spin unlock uses spurious ipi "lock_kicker_irq" to wake up blocked vCPUs > waiting on that lock. This irq should always be disabled. However, when Dom0 > is shuting down, function fixup_irqs is called which unmasks all irqs. > Function unmask_irq effectively re-enables lock_kicker_irq and its irq > handler > is invoked which reports bug and crashes Dom0. > > This patch sets IRQ_PER_CPU flag in irq desc and excludes percpu IRQs from > being fixed up when taking CPUs down. > > Signed-off-by: Fengzhe Zhang <fengzhe.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c > index 977d8b4..f0f9450 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c > @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ void fixup_irqs(void) > if (irq == 2) > continue; > > + if (desc->status & IRQ_PER_CPU) > + continue; > + > /* interrupt's are disabled at this point */ > spin_lock(&desc->lock); > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c > index f34e231..26bc55a 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c > @@ -727,10 +727,9 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, > struct irqaction *new) > goto out_thread; > } else > compat_irq_chip_set_default_handler(desc); > -#if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_PER_CPU) Why? XEN should select IRQ_PER_CPU instead in its Kconfig. Jan > + > if (new->flags & IRQF_PERCPU) > desc->status |= IRQ_PER_CPU; > -#endif > > desc->status &= ~(IRQ_AUTODETECT | IRQ_WAITING | IRQ_ONESHOT | > IRQ_INPROGRESS | IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |