Re: [xen-devel][PATCH 2/5] Xl interface change plus changes to code it impacts

[Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx>]

>> Did we decide to leave DISK_BACKEND_DEFAULT (i.e. libxl chooses based on
>> the image type, host's backend support etc) for 4.2? I don't mind if we
>> did but does that make "block-dev-type" as described in patch 1/5
>> non-optional? (and therefore not really deprecated)
> 
> Maybe this is handled in xl by patch 3/5?
> 
> (I should really apply the patch and read the result instead of trying
> to decode the meaning from the patch form)
> 
Yes, a fallback value is set in 3/5 but patch 5/5 will remove that fallback and
do appropriate validation to better handle this.

Kamala


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel