[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] RE: [xen-unstable test] 5482: regressions - FAIL

To: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:11:27 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, keir@xxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:12:13 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Kay, Allen M writes ("[Xen-devel] RE: [xen-unstable test] 5482: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> Attached patch disables pci_vtd_quirk for 32-bit Xen since 32-bit xen does 
> not support MMCFG access.

Thanks, that looks like a plausible fix to me so I have applied it.
That way we should avoid getting this failure in our tests again.

CC'd Keir in case he minds the #ifdef or has some other comment to
make.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [xen-unstable test] 5482: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: fix broken cpupool-numa-split (part 2)
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Three small patches for xen-4.1.0-rc
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: fix broken cpupool-numa-split (part 2)
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [xen-unstable test] 5482: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.