[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 06/10] xen/setup: Only set identity mapping in E820 regions when privileged.

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 12/21/2010 01:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> We do not want to set the identity mapping on E820 reserved
> regions when running as PV. This is b/c the 0->ISA_END_ADDRESS region
> would be considered identity and we would try to read DMI information
> and fail (since the pfn_to_mfn(mfn)==pfn) under PV guests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/setup.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> index 752c865..34fb906 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static unsigned long __init xen_set_identity(const struct 
> e820map *e820)
>               if (end < start)
>                       continue;
>  
> -             if (e820->map[i].type != E820_RAM) {
> +             if (xen_initial_domain() && e820->map[i].type != E820_RAM) {
>                       for (pfn = PFN_UP(start); pfn < PFN_DOWN(end); pfn++)
>                               set_phys_to_machine(pfn, pfn);
>                       identity += pfn - PFN_UP(start);

So you're relying on the fact that the ISA area is the only non-RAM e820
entry in domU?  I think it would be better to do a specific exclusion
for the ISA area rather than this.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel