|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualization: hap-on-hap
At 17:49 +0000 on 02 Dec (1291312156), Christoph Egger wrote: > > My comments on why p2m_flush_locked() isn't enough to reclaim an in-use > > p2m for recycling still stand. > > Can you point me to the mail in the ML archive you refer to, please? It's the discussion at the end of this email: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00624.html Cheers, Tim. -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |