[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: HVM X2APIC support
On 12/01/2010 07:03 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > This patch is similiar to Gleb Natapov's patch for KVM, which enable the > hypervisor to emulate x2apic feature for the guest. By this way, the emulation > of lapic would be simpler with x2apic interface(MSR), and faster. We have a set of patches to directly use event channels from within hvm domains, completely bypassing the apic altogether. Do we need this as well? > Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 33 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 4 +++- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 19 ------------------- > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h > b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h > index 396ff4c..e862874 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h > @@ -37,4 +37,37 @@ > extern struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_info; > extern struct start_info *xen_start_info; > > +#include <asm/processor.h> > + > +static inline uint32_t xen_cpuid_base(void) > +{ > + uint32_t base, eax, ebx, ecx, edx; > + char signature[13]; > + > + for (base = 0x40000000; base < 0x40010000; base += 0x100) { > + cpuid(base, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 0) = ebx; > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 4) = ecx; > + *(uint32_t *)(signature + 8) = edx; > + signature[12] = 0; > + > + if (!strcmp("XenVMMXenVMM", signature) && ((eax - base) >= 2)) > + return base; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN > +static inline bool xen_para_available(void) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +#else > +static inline bool xen_para_available(void) > +{ > + return (xen_cpuid_base() != 0); > +} > +#endif So this returns true if you're running a kernel without CONFIG_XEN under Xen? Does that assume that all versions of Xen implement x2apic emulation? Why wouldn't we also want this for CONFIG_XEN kernels? J > + > #endif /* _ASM_X86_XEN_HYPERVISOR_H */ > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > index 3f838d5..1b68221 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ > #include <asm/mce.h> > #include <asm/kvm_para.h> > #include <asm/tsc.h> > +#include <asm/xen/hypervisor.h> > > unsigned int num_processors; > > @@ -1476,7 +1477,8 @@ void __init enable_IR_x2apic(void) > /* IR is required if there is APIC ID > 255 even when running > * under KVM > */ > - if (max_physical_apicid > 255 || !kvm_para_available()) > + if (max_physical_apicid > 255 || > + (!kvm_para_available() && !xen_para_available())) > goto nox2apic; > /* > * without IR all CPUs can be addressed by IOAPIC/MSI > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index 235c0f4..819c365 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -1245,25 +1245,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) > #endif > } > > -static uint32_t xen_cpuid_base(void) > -{ > - uint32_t base, eax, ebx, ecx, edx; > - char signature[13]; > - > - for (base = 0x40000000; base < 0x40010000; base += 0x100) { > - cpuid(base, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > - *(uint32_t *)(signature + 0) = ebx; > - *(uint32_t *)(signature + 4) = ecx; > - *(uint32_t *)(signature + 8) = edx; > - signature[12] = 0; > - > - if (!strcmp("XenVMMXenVMM", signature) && ((eax - base) >= 2)) > - return base; > - } > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static int init_hvm_pv_info(int *major, int *minor) > { > uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx, pages, msr, base; _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |