[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V7 00/15] Xen device model support

[Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>]

On 29.11.2010, at 17:06, Anthony PERARD wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 29.11.2010, at 16:10, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 23.11.2010, at 20:51, Anthony.Perard@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is the V7 of the patch series that adds Xen device model support in 
>>>>> QEMU.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The change made on it since the v6:
>>>>> - I introduce a patch from Alexander Graf to add a generic layer for the 
>>>>> Xen calls.
>>>>> - So compatibility support have been transformed from macros to function.
>>>>> - Now, xenfv machine uses a new field default_machine_opts to specify 
>>>>> that Xen will be use.
>>>>> - in xen_init, xen_mode is override to XEN_ATTACH if it was XEN_EMULATE.
>>>> 
>>>> Please try to compile the code on Xen 4.0 :). I'm just trying to rebase 
>>>> xenner against your tree and the build already fails because of missing 
>>>> xen_common.h includes.
>>> 
>>> :(, I don't have any error with both Xen 4.0.{0,1}.
>>> 
>>> # Configured with: '../configure' '--target-list=i386-softmmu' 
>>> '--enable-xen' 
>>> '--extra-cflags=-I/tmp/xen/xen-4.0.1/dist/install/usr/include' 
>>> '--extra-ldflags=-L/tmp/xen/xen-4.0.1/dist/install/usr/lib'
>>> 
>>> Did you use other options with your configure?
>>> Where are the missings includes?
>>> Also, I only compile on 32bits.
>> 
>> Ugh. Yes, my bad. It broke in my xenner patches :). Sorry. The issue was 
>> that #include "xen_interfaces.h" without a preceding #include "xen_common.h" 
>> breaks. Maybe it'd be good to move the "xen_common.h" include into "xen.h"? 
>> Doesn't really matter though. I'll try to take on a code review today, so we 
>> can merge the patches asap!
> 
> Actually, it's better to put "#include xen_common.h" in xen_interfaces.h
> because I use stuff from there.

The rest looks very good, so I'm optimistic we'll have a well mergable version 
this week :).


Alex


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel