[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: pvops kernel branches - 2.6.36 options, stable/next/etc?
> > Well, I am working on a PCI E820 hole thingie, > > > If this for the 4GB mem limit on pvops domUs? Yup. I got it to boot nicely yesterday too. The patches are in devel/e820-hole, _but_ you need patches for the toolstack. Those aren't ready yet (they are quite skanky right now). > > Hmm, so the difference between that and the upstream is the PVonHVM and > > the initial domain 0 support (all in Stefano's tree). > > > > I tried disabling the CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM with no change. (see the "2.6.37-rc1 > mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request" thread. > Is that sufficient to eliminate the PnonHVM from the equation? Yes should be. And based on your output it doesn't seem to make much difference. I think bisecting the code and just running as DomU PV (without PCI passthrough) and trying different kernels: 2.6.36, 2.6.35, 2.6.34 and seeing if you get the same or similar hang can help us a bit. If you can get hold of Boris you could both coordinate this? I've got to fix this AMD bootup hang, but once I am done I can switch over to this, unless somebody else picks it up (Jeremy, Stefano, Ian?) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |