Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] save/restore/migrate kernel questions

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>

From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:37:58 +0000

Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:39:36 -0800

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=TIAvQLZe2Sp1AXyZ1LVxJxl++c9THPcD7As7EiGNoQMk0ebzUejfXgNbnlYqkSELeD KygWQYmrXWSqZGMzW+sYxRbW9xuVKUJalytLLgP71kW2udDg/xWWUiTWUVHlGZgWZjpm kptb7tA7pt3y7ymPdKYnan+cVUgEldh7dhRx8=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thread-index: AcuAspOoQgWRHm9lqUC2ZxBlduQ9ug==

Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] save/restore/migrate kernel questions

On 10/11/2010 08:07, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Keir: In the 2.6.18 kernel, the suspend event channel gets set up > even for Dom0. This as well as the registering of the shutdown > watch seems pointless (and dangerous in case something > connected to it say due to a bug) to me in that context. Am I > missing something? Probably not. I wouldn't have considered it a problem -- users will be pissed if some entity starts randomly connecting to and shutting down any guest, regardless if it's dom0 or a domU. Best not do that. ;-) -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.