[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2589: regressions - FAIL

To: xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:55:31 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:56:11 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

xen.org writes ("[Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2589: regressions - FAIL"):
> flight 2589 xen-4.0-testing real
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/2589/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> tests which did not succeed:
>test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl    8 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 2544

This is almost certainly the existing XCP block device creation race.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2589: regressions - FAIL
  - From: xen . org

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vif-common.sh prevent physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] stubdom questions
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2589: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Adding back CPUID support for Xsave
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.