[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
It should. "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> Commit-ID: 77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb >>> Gitweb: >>> http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb >>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200 >>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200 >>> >>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling >>> >>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen >>> experts :) >> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen. The WARN_ON(res != >> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results. > >Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq >rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data >structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays? > >Thanks, > J -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |