[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] xen: remap GSIs as pirqs when running as initial domain
> > > +void __init xen_setup_pirqs(void) > > > +{ > > > + int irq; > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP > > > + int nr_ioapics = 1; > > > +#endif > > > > Should this be defined in a header instead? Was this nr_ioapics==1 > > meant to fall in the '0 == nr_ioapics' to setup the first sixteen > > irqs? > > > > Is CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC more appropiate than CONFIG_SMP? > > I think it was supposed to fix a compilation error in case > CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC is not set, so that in both cases in which an ioapic > is not present in the system or the ioapic support is not compiled in > the kernel we would fall in the '0 == nr_ioapics' code path. That is what I thought, but nr_ioapics is set to one, so how do we fall in 0 == 1 code path? > So I guess the right thing to do here would be to replace CONFIG_SMP > with CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC. > I don't think that it is worth moving these three lines into an header > file. OK. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |