Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix libxl build issues

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 20.09.10 at 15:38, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen<pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:33:24PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> It would also have been nice if the minimal flex/bison versions needed
>> to successfully build libxl were documented: neither flex 2.5.31 nor
>> bison 2.1 (as found e.g. on SLE10) is sufficient.
>> 
> 
> There's a note about this on the Xen4.0 wiki page ("release notes"),
> but it could be made more clear, stating the actual versions etc.
> 
> So what is actually the required version of flex? 

On top of what I wrote already, I can only state that (surprise,
surprise) current upstream works.

> Should this be written also to some file in the xen source tree? 

Yes, this is what I was after.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel