[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/16] vmx: nest: vmresume/vmlaunch
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 11:52:26 Christoph Egger wrote: > On Wednesday 08 September 2010 17:22:16 Qing He wrote: > > vmresume and vmlaunch instructions and transitional states > > > > Signed-off-by: Qing He <qing.he@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > diff -r e828d55c10bb xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/nest.c > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/nest.c Wed Sep 08 21:42:10 2010 +0800 > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/nest.c Wed Sep 08 22:04:16 2010 +0800 > > @@ -633,3 +633,33 @@ > > hvm_inject_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, 0, 0); > > return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION; > > } > > + > > +int vmx_nest_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + struct vcpu *v = current; > > + struct vmx_nest_struct *nest = &v->arch.hvm_vmx.nest; > > + int rc; > > + > > + if ( unlikely(!nest->guest_vmxon_pa) ) > > + goto invalid_op; > > + > > + rc = vmx_inst_check_privilege(regs); > > + if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + if ( nest->vmcs_valid == 1 ) > > + nest->vmresume_pending = 1; > > + else > > + vmreturn(regs, VMFAIL_INVALID); > > + > > + return X86EMUL_OKAY; > > + > > +invalid_op: > > + hvm_inject_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, 0, 0); > > + return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION; > > +} > > + > > +int vmx_nest_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + return vmx_nest_handle_vmresume(regs); > > +} > > diff -r e828d55c10bb xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 08 21:42:10 2010 +0800 > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c Wed Sep 08 22:04:16 2010 +0800 > > @@ -2321,6 +2321,11 @@ > > /* Now enable interrupts so it's safe to take locks. */ > > local_irq_enable(); > > > > + /* XXX: This looks ugly, but we need a mechanism to ensure > > + * any pending vmresume has really happened > > + */ > > + v->arch.hvm_vmx.nest.vmresume_in_progress = 0; > > + > > if ( unlikely(exit_reason & VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY) ) > > return vmx_failed_vmentry(exit_reason, regs); > > > > @@ -2592,6 +2597,11 @@ > > if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmclear(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > > break; > > + case EXIT_REASON_VMLAUNCH: > > + inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > > + if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmlaunch(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > + __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > > + break; > > case EXIT_REASON_VMPTRLD: > > inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > > if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmptrld(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > @@ -2607,6 +2617,11 @@ > > if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmread(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > > break; > > + case EXIT_REASON_VMRESUME: > > + inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > > + if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmresume(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > + __update_guest_eip(inst_len); > > + break; > > case EXIT_REASON_VMWRITE: > > inst_len = __get_instruction_length(); > > if ( vmx_nest_handle_vmwrite(regs) == X86EMUL_OKAY ) > > @@ -2625,8 +2640,6 @@ > > > > case EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION: > > case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION: > > - case EXIT_REASON_VMLAUNCH: > > - case EXIT_REASON_VMRESUME: > > vmx_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, > > HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE); break; > > > > diff -r e828d55c10bb xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/nest.h > > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/nest.h Wed Sep 08 21:42:10 2010 +0800 > > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/nest.h Wed Sep 08 22:04:16 2010 +0800 > > @@ -40,6 +40,20 @@ > > void *vvmcs; > > struct vmcs_struct *svmcs; > > int vmcs_valid; > > + > > + /* > > + * vmexit_pending and vmresume_pending is to mark pending > > + * switches, they are cleared when physical vmcs is changed. > > + */ > > + int vmexit_pending; > > + int vmresume_pending; > > This is functional equal to the vmentry flag in struct nestedhvm. Is it possible to have both vmexit and vmresume pending at the same time ? Christoph > > > + /* > > + * upon L1->L2, there is a window between context switch and > > + * the physical vmentry of the shadow vmcs, protect against it > > + * with vmresume_in_progress > > + */ > > + int vmresume_in_progress; > > }; > > What is the window you describe in the comment ? And which problem > does it arise? > > You use this to check if you can inject interrupts into the l2 guest. > To merge the interrupt code as Tim said in > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00747.html > you can probably use the nh_gif field for this. > > > Christoph > > > int vmx_nest_handle_vmxon(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > @@ -52,4 +66,7 @@ > > int vmx_nest_handle_vmread(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > int vmx_nest_handle_vmwrite(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > > > +int vmx_nest_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > +int vmx_nest_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs); > > + > > #endif /* __ASM_X86_HVM_NEST_H__ */ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |