Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: succeed silently on restore

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: succeed silently on 
restore"):
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 18:07 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > A related problem is that it is very difficult for the caller to
> > determine when the replication has been properly set up: ie, to know
> > when the receiver has got at least one whole checkpoint.
> 
> I think this actually does work with the code as it is -- the receive
> will return error if it doesn't get at least one whole checkpoint and
> will return success and commit to the most recent complete checkpoint
> otherwise.

Except that the caller doesn't get either of these indications until
the replication session eventually fails.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel